KIRITBHAI SHANKARBHAI PARMAR vs RAMESHBHAI PITARBHAI RATHOD Advocate - D B AUTHOR — 20/2018
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 009,. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 06th March 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJKH160002432018
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
20/2018
Filing Date
11-05-2018
Registration No
20/2018
Registration Date
11-05-2018
Court
TALUKA COURT, VASO
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KIRITBHAI SHANKARBHAI PARMAR
Adv. S.T.PATELIYA
Respondent(s)
RAMESHBHAI PITARBHAI RATHOD Advocate - D B AUTHOR
PRAVINBHAI SULEMANBHAI RATHOD
Adv. D B AUTHOR
SEVAKBHAI SULEMANBHAI RATHOD
Adv. D B AUTHOR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 30-01-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 13-01-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 23-12-2025 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court partially allowed the plaintiff's suit regarding a property (plot no. 213) in village Zharol, Kheda district. The court ruled that the plaintiff is entitled to possession of the disputed property that the defendants illegally occupied, but rejected other claims including requests for permanent injunction and case costs. The defendants were ordered to vacate and return the property to the plaintiff, with the judgment dismissing frivolous allegations of criminal threats made by the defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The court partially allowed the plaintiff's suit regarding a property (plot no. 213) in village Zharol, Kheda district. The court ruled that the plaintiff is entitled to possession of the disputed property that the defendants illegally occupied, but rejected other claims including requests for permanent injunction and case costs. The defendants were ordered to vacate and return the property to the plaintiff, with the judgment dismissing frivolous allegations of criminal threats made by the defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts