SURESHBHAI MOTHIBHAI PATEL(Legal Heir) vs PATEL JAYESHBHAI RAMESHBHAI Advocate - B D VYAS — 17/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Status: Plaintiff Evidence. Next hearing: 24th April 2026.

Plaintiff Evidence Next hearing 24-Apr-2026 this date has passed

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJKH160001562024

Filing Number

17/2024

Filing Date

24-Apr-2024

Registration No

17/2024

Registration Date

24-Apr-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, VASO

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 9

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SURESHBHAI MOTHIBHAI PATEL(Legal Heir)

    Adv. K N PATEL1.

  2. 2.USHABEN SURESHBHAI PATEL

    Adv. K N PATEL1.

  3. 3.GAURANGKUMAR SURESHBHAI PATEL

    Adv. K N PATEL1.

  4. 4.NISHABEN SURESHBHAI PATEL

    Adv. K N PATEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PATEL JAYESHBHAI RAMESHBHAI Advocate - B D VYAS

Case History

  1. 24-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 20-Mar-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 06-Feb-2026

    OrderView PDF

  5. 06-Feb-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: The court granted an interim injunction (preliminary order) in favor of the plaintiffs in this property dispute case. The court ordered that the defendant shall not interfere with the plaintiffs' cultivation rights or access to the agricultural land (Survey No. 588, Account No. 225, Moje Khandhalti Taluka, Vasad) or obstruct their use of the well located on the property until final disposal of the case. The court found the plaintiffs' prima facie case to be established and held that balance of convenience favored granting the interim relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 06-Feb-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 16-Jan-2026

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 01-Dec-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 01-Nov-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 01-Oct-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 28-Aug-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 29-Jul-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 01-Jul-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 10-Jun-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 29-Apr-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 08-Apr-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 04-Mar-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 04-Feb-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 28-Jan-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 07-Jan-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 10-Dec-2024

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 26-Nov-2024

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 15-Oct-2024

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 10-Sep-2024

    For Counter Affidavit

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 13-Aug-2024

    For Counter Affidavit

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 09-Jul-2024

    For Counter Affidavit

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  27. 11-Jun-2024

    Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  28. 08-May-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  29. 24-Apr-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 17/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court granted an interim injunction (preliminary order) in favor of the plaintiffs in this property dispute case. The court ordered that the defendant shall not interfere with the plaintiffs' cultivation rights or access to the agricultural land (Survey No. 588, Account No. 225, Moje Khandhalti Taluka, Vasad) or obstruct their use of the well located on the property until final disposal of the case. The court found the plaintiffs' prima facie case to be established and held that balance of convenience favored granting the interim relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case