SURESHBHAI MOTHIBHAI PATEL(Legal Heir) vs PATEL JAYESHBHAI RAMESHBHAI Advocate - B D VYAS — 17/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9,. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 24th April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJKH160001562024
Next Hearing
24th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
17/2024
Filing Date
24-04-2024
Registration No
17/2024
Registration Date
24-04-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, VASO
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SURESHBHAI MOTHIBHAI PATEL(Legal Heir)
Adv. K N PATEL1.
USHABEN SURESHBHAI PATEL
Adv. K N PATEL1.
GAURANGKUMAR SURESHBHAI PATEL
Adv. K N PATEL1.
NISHABEN SURESHBHAI PATEL
Adv. K N PATEL
Respondent(s)
PATEL JAYESHBHAI RAMESHBHAI Advocate - B D VYAS
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION
HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 20-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 09-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 06-02-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 16-01-2026 | HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION | |
| 01-12-2025 | HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court granted an interim injunction (preliminary order) in favor of the plaintiffs in this property dispute case. The court ordered that the defendant shall not interfere with the plaintiffs' cultivation rights or access to the agricultural land (Survey No. 588, Account No. 225, Moje Khandhalti Taluka, Vasad) or obstruct their use of the well located on the property until final disposal of the case. The court found the plaintiffs' prima facie case to be established and held that balance of convenience favored granting the interim relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court granted an interim injunction (preliminary order) in favor of the plaintiffs in this property dispute case. The court ordered that the defendant shall not interfere with the plaintiffs' cultivation rights or access to the agricultural land (Survey No. 588, Account No. 225, Moje Khandhalti Taluka, Vasad) or obstruct their use of the well located on the property until final disposal of the case. The court found the plaintiffs' prima facie case to be established and held that balance of convenience favored granting the interim relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts