DHARMENDRA VISHNUBHAI PATEL vs ASHWINKUMAR JAYANTILAL PATEL Advocate - H D SOLANKI — 106/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 24th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKH160001182025
Filing Number
106/2025
Filing Date
10-Mar-2025
Registration No
106/2025
Registration Date
10-Mar-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, VASO
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
24-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION
Last updated 16-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DHARMENDRA VISHNUBHAI PATEL
Adv. S M MALEK
Respondent(s)
-
1.ASHWINKUMAR JAYANTILAL PATEL Advocate - H D SOLANKI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: C.C. No. 106/2025 Court Decision: The court convicted the accused Ashwinkumar Jayantilal Patel under the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 138, for issuing a dishonored check. The accused issued a check for Rs. 10,00,000 to the complainant, which was returned by the bank with "Insufficient Funds" notation. Despite receiving notice, the accused failed to pay the amount, constituting a criminal offense. Key Reasoning: The court found that the accused signed and delivered the check to discharge a debt/liability, the check was presented within three months, it was dishonored due to insufficient funds, and proper notice was served but not complied with—all essential elements under Section 138 being satisfied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Apr-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
26-Feb-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Feb-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
31-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Defence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Defence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Defence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
25-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Defence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Defence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Defence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Defence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Defence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Sep-2025
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Complainant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Complainant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Complainant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Complainant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Complainant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Jun-2025
Plea
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
26-May-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-May-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Apr-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Mar-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 106/2025
Case Summary: C.C. No. 106/2025 Court Decision: The court convicted the accused Ashwinkumar Jayantilal Patel under the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 138, for issuing a dishonored check. The accused issued a check for Rs. 10,00,000 to the complainant, which was returned by the bank with "Insufficient Funds" notation. Despite receiving notice, the accused failed to pay the amount, constituting a criminal offense. Key Reasoning: The court found that the accused signed and delivered the check to discharge a debt/liability, the check was presented within three months, it was dishonored due to insufficient funds, and proper notice was served but not complied with—all essential elements under Section 138 being satisfied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts