DINESHBHAI KHODABHAI PATEL vs REKHABEN NILESHBHAI PATEL — 1/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 23rd March 2026.

EXE R - EXECUTION PETITION - REGULAR

CNR: GJKH160000742026

Case disposed

Filing Number

1/2026

Filing Date

18-02-2026

Registration No

1/2026

Registration Date

18-02-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, VASO

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

23rd March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 9

Petitioner(s)

DINESHBHAI KHODABHAI PATEL

Adv. R B PRAJAPATI

Respondent(s)

REKHABEN NILESHBHAI PATEL

SAGIR TANISHA NILESHBHAI PATEL GUARDIAN REKHABEN NILESHBHAI

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

23-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR

03-03-2026

SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR

18-02-2026

SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR

Final Orders / Judgements

23-03-2026
ORDER

Case Summary: EXE R.1/2026 The court granted petitioner Dineshbhai Khodabhai Patel's execution petition seeking enforcement of an earlier decree (R.D.M. 1/2021) against respondent Rekhaben Nileshbhai Patel. The earlier order had granted drainage rights for rainwater on the respondent's western property boundary and mandated removal of obstructing structures within 60 days, which the respondent failed to comply with. The court appointed a Court Commissioner to enforce the decree, directing removal of all constructions blocking water and air passage at petitioner's expense but recoverable from respondent. The judgment includes detailed procedural instructions for videography, police protection if needed, and recovery of all execution costs from the respondent's property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: EXE R.1/2026 The court granted petitioner Dineshbhai Khodabhai Patel's execution petition seeking enforcement of an earlier decree (R.D.M. 1/2021) against respondent Rekhaben Nileshbhai Patel. The earlier order had granted drainage rights for rainwater on the respondent's western property boundary and mandated removal of obstructing structures within 60 days, which the respondent failed to comply with. The court appointed a Court Commissioner to enforce the decree, directing removal of all constructions blocking water and air passage at petitioner's expense but recoverable from respondent. The judgment includes detailed procedural instructions for videography, police protection if needed, and recovery of all execution costs from the respondent's property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, VASO All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case