RITEN DHARMESHBHAI PATEL vs MEHULBHAI KHUSHALBHAI SUTARIYA — 37/2026

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH160000442026

Filing Number

37/2026

Filing Date

27-Jan-2026

Registration No

37/2026

Registration Date

27-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, VASO

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 16-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RITEN DHARMESHBHAI PATEL

    Adv. S M MALEK

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MEHULBHAI KHUSHALBHAI SUTARIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    Summary The Gujarat High Court dismissed a petition filed under Article 13 of the Constitution, noting that the petitioner had already reached a settlement with the respondent. The court held that since the matter was settled, there was no basis to continue proceedings, and ordered the case to be closed with each party bearing its own court costs as per the order dated 14/03/2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 05-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 27-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 12-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 11-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 27-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 27-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 37/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Gujarat High Court dismissed a petition filed under Article 13 of the Constitution, noting that the petitioner had already reached a settlement with the respondent. The court held that since the matter was settled, there was no basis to continue proceedings, and ordered the case to be closed with each party bearing its own court costs as per the order dated 14/03/2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case