Natubhai Aashabhai Solanki vs Ceema Electricals Lighting Products India Pvt Lmited Advocate - M.G.Memon — 203/2024

Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10(1)(C). Status: For Evidence of Second party. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.

For Evidence of Second party Next hearing 25-Jun-2026 this date has passed

REFER T LC - Referance T

CNR: GJKH140004822024

Filing Number

203/2024

Filing Date

03-Sep-2024

Registration No

203/2024

Registration Date

03-Sep-2024

Court

LABOUR COURT, NADIAD

Judge

1-Judge, Labour Court

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10(1)(C)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Natubhai Aashabhai Solanki

    Adv. Dharmesh Shah

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ceema Electricals Lighting Products India Pvt Lmited Advocate - M.G.Memon

  2. 2.Om Shiva Enterprise

Case History

  1. 25-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 21-May-2026

    For Evidence of Second party

    Judge, Labour Court

  3. 23-Apr-2026

    For Evidence of Second party

    Judge, Labour Court

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    For Written Statement

    Judge, Labour Court

  5. 02-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 203/2024 Natubhai Aashabhai Solanki v. Ceema Electricals Lighting Products India Pvt Ltd & Others The petitioner's reference case seeking to set aside an Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) tribunal order was dismissed. The court held that once a Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) is initiated under the IBC, a moratorium under Section 14 prohibits all proceedings against the corporate debtor in other forums. The petitioner, a trade union representing workers owed unpaid wages since 2018, cannot pursue separate legal action when the company is already undergoing CIRP proceedings where worker claims have been admitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 02-Apr-2026

    For Written Statement

    Judge, Labour Court

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    For Written Statement

    Judge, Labour Court

  8. 05-Mar-2026

    For Written Statement

    Judge, Labour Court

  9. 19-Feb-2026

    For Written Statement

    Judge, Labour Court

  10. 29-Jan-2026

    For Written Statement

    Judge, Labour Court

  11. 01-Jan-2026

    For Written Statement

    Judge, Labour Court

  12. 04-Dec-2025

    For Written Statement

    Judge, Labour Court

  13. 06-Nov-2025

    For Written Statement

    Judge, Labour Court

  14. 09-Oct-2025

    For Written Statement

    Judge, Labour Court

  15. 04-Sep-2025

    For Notice Serve to both partys

    Judge, Labour Court

  16. 18-Aug-2025

    For Notice Serve to both partys

    Judge, Labour Court

  17. 22-Jul-2025

    For Notice Serve to both partys

    Judge, Labour Court

  18. 03-Jul-2025

    For Notice Serve to both partys

    Judge, Labour Court

  19. 28-Apr-2025

    For Notice Serve to both partys

    Judge, Labour Court

  20. 21-Feb-2025

    For Notice Serve to both partys

    Judge, Labour Court

  21. 03-Jan-2025

    For Notice Serve to both partys

    Judge, Labour Court

  22. 29-Nov-2024

    For Notice Serve to both partys

    Judge, Labour Court

  23. 25-Oct-2024

    For Notice Serve to both partys

    Judge, Labour Court

  24. 01-Oct-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  25. 03-Sep-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 203/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 203/2024 Natubhai Aashabhai Solanki v. Ceema Electricals Lighting Products India Pvt Ltd & Others The petitioner's reference case seeking to set aside an Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) tribunal order was dismissed. The court held that once a Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) is initiated under the IBC, a moratorium under Section 14 prohibits all proceedings against the corporate debtor in other forums. The petitioner, a trade union representing workers owed unpaid wages since 2018, cannot pursue separate legal action when the company is already undergoing CIRP proceedings where worker claims have been admitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case