Priteshkumar Harichanda Pandit vs Ceema Electricals Lighting Products India Pvt Lmited — 165/2024

Case under The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10(1)(C). Status: For Written Statement. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

For Written Statement Next hearing 12-Jun-2026 this date has passed

REFER T LC - Referance T

CNR: GJKH140004172024

Filing Number

165/2024

Filing Date

13-Aug-2024

Registration No

165/2024

Registration Date

13-Aug-2024

Court

LABOUR COURT, NADIAD

Judge

1-Judge, Labour Court

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10(1)(C)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Priteshkumar Harichanda Pandit

    Adv. D.H.Shah

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ceema Electricals Lighting Products India Pvt Lmited

  2. 2.Helex Security and Consultancy Services

    Adv. B.B.Christian

Case History

  1. 12-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-May-2026

    For Written Statement

    Judge, Labour Court

  3. 24-Apr-2026

    For Written Statement

    Judge, Labour Court

  4. 02-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 165/2024 Petitioner: Priteshkumar Harichanda Pandit Respondents: Ceema Electricals Lighting Products India Pvt Limited and Helex Security and Consultancy Services Outcome: The petition is ALLOWED. The court dismissed the reference case filed by the respondents against the petitioner. The court held that proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) 2016 Section 14 create a moratorium prohibiting all legal proceedings against the corporate debtor. Since the National Company Law Tribunal had already declared moratorium and appointed an Interim Resolution Professional with a new IRP subsequently appointed on 14.02.2025, no court has jurisdiction to continue proceedings. The court directed that all pending litigation, appeals, and cases against the company be dismissed, and assets be distributed among creditors under IBC Section 53. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 02-Apr-2026

    For Written Statement

    Judge, Labour Court

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    For Written Statement

    Judge, Labour Court

  7. 05-Mar-2026

    For Written Statement

    Judge, Labour Court

  8. 19-Feb-2026

    For Written Statement

    Judge, Labour Court

  9. 29-Jan-2026

    For Written Statement

    Judge, Labour Court

  10. 01-Jan-2026

    For Written Statement

    Judge, Labour Court

  11. 04-Dec-2025

    For Notice Serve to both partys

    Judge, Labour Court

  12. 06-Nov-2025

    For Notice Serve to both partys

    Judge, Labour Court

  13. 25-Sep-2025

    For Notice Serve to both partys

    Judge, Labour Court

  14. 18-Aug-2025

    For Notice Serve to both partys

    Judge, Labour Court

  15. 22-Jul-2025

    For Notice Serve to both partys

    Judge, Labour Court

  16. 03-Jul-2025

    For Notice Serve to both partys

    Judge, Labour Court

  17. 28-Apr-2025

    For Notice Serve to both partys

    Judge, Labour Court

  18. 21-Feb-2025

    For Notice Serve to both partys

    Judge, Labour Court

  19. 03-Jan-2025

    For Notice Serve to both partys

    Judge, Labour Court

  20. 29-Nov-2024

    For Notice Serve to both partys

    Judge, Labour Court

  21. 25-Oct-2024

    For Notice Serve to both partys

    Judge, Labour Court

  22. 01-Oct-2024

    For Notice Serve to both partys

    Judge, Labour Court

  23. 17-Sep-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  24. 13-Aug-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 165/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 165/2024 Petitioner: Priteshkumar Harichanda Pandit Respondents: Ceema Electricals Lighting Products India Pvt Limited and Helex Security and Consultancy Services Outcome: The petition is ALLOWED. The court dismissed the reference case filed by the respondents against the petitioner. The court held that proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) 2016 Section 14 create a moratorium prohibiting all legal proceedings against the corporate debtor. Since the National Company Law Tribunal had already declared moratorium and appointed an Interim Resolution Professional with a new IRP subsequently appointed on 14.02.2025, no court has jurisdiction to continue proceedings. The court directed that all pending litigation, appeals, and cases against the company be dismissed, and assets be distributed among creditors under IBC Section 53. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case