Imrankhan Jaafarkhan Pathaan vs Chaklaasi Nagar Sevasadan — 58/2025

Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33 C 1. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 07th April 2026.

Case disposed

RECO33C1 LC - Recovery 33C (1)

CNR: GJKH140003902025

Filing Number

58/2025

Filing Date

17-Nov-2025

Registration No

58/2025

Registration Date

17-Nov-2025

Court

LABOUR COURT, NADIAD

Judge

1-Judge, Labour Court

Decision Date

07-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33 C 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Imrankhan Jaafarkhan Pathaan

    Adv. S K RANA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Chaklaasi Nagar Sevasadan

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Apr-2026

    Judegement

    Summary of Recovery Case 58/2025 The Nadiad Labor Court partially allowed petitioner Imrankhan Jaafarkhan Pathaan's recovery plea against Chaklaasi Nagar Sevasadan, directing the respondent to pay ₹93,038 (the principal amount plus 20% interest accrued from April 2023 to April 2025). The court found the respondent liable for the debt under a prior recovery judgment but noted the respondent's non-cooperation and failure to make payment despite legal obligation, warranting the issuance of a recovery certificate to facilitate enforcement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Judge, Labour Court

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    For Order

    Judge, Labour Court

  5. 17-Feb-2026

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  6. 20-Jan-2026

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  7. 16-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 17-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 58/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Recovery Case 58/2025 The Nadiad Labor Court partially allowed petitioner Imrankhan Jaafarkhan Pathaan's recovery plea against Chaklaasi Nagar Sevasadan, directing the respondent to pay ₹93,038 (the principal amount plus 20% interest accrued from April 2023 to April 2025). The court found the respondent liable for the debt under a prior recovery judgment but noted the respondent's non-cooperation and failure to make payment despite legal obligation, warranting the issuance of a recovery certificate to facilitate enforcement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case