Yakubahusain Ilnodin Khokhar vs Ceema Electricals Lighting Products India Pvt Lmited — 159/2024

Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10(1)(c). Status: For Written Statement. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

REFER T LC - Referance T

CNR: GJKH140003322024

For Written Statement

Next Hearing

12th June 2026

Filing Number

159/2024

Filing Date

15-07-2024

Registration No

159/2024

Registration Date

15-07-2024

Court

LABOUR COURT, NADIAD

Judge

1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT

Acts & Sections

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10(1)(c)

Petitioner(s)

Yakubahusain Ilnodin Khokhar

Adv. D.H.Shah

Respondent(s)

Ceema Electricals Lighting Products India Pvt Lmited

Halex Security and Counsultant Services

Adv. B.B.Christian

Hearing History

Judge: 1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT

08-05-2026

For Written Statement

24-04-2026

For Written Statement

02-04-2026

For Written Statement

12-03-2026

For Written Statement

05-03-2026

For Written Statement

Interim Orders

02-04-2026
ORDER

Case Summary: 159/2024 Petitioner: Yakubahusain Ilnodin Khokhar Respondent: Ceema Electricals Lighting Products India Pvt Ltd and Halex Security and Consultant Services Order: The petition is ALLOWED. The reference case filed by respondent Ceema Electricals against petitioner is DISMISSED. All proceedings against the petitioner in connection with the referenced insolvency matter are STAYED, and the Interim Resolution Professional's directive regarding corporate debtor status and IRP appointment is SET ASIDE. The case involves interpretation of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code's moratorium provisions and jurisdiction of courts under Section 14 IBC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 159/2024 Petitioner: Yakubahusain Ilnodin Khokhar Respondent: Ceema Electricals Lighting Products India Pvt Ltd and Halex Security and Consultant Services Order: The petition is ALLOWED. The reference case filed by respondent Ceema Electricals against petitioner is DISMISSED. All proceedings against the petitioner in connection with the referenced insolvency matter are STAYED, and the Interim Resolution Professional's directive regarding corporate debtor status and IRP appointment is SET ASIDE. The case involves interpretation of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code's moratorium provisions and jurisdiction of courts under Section 14 IBC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

LABOUR COURT, NADIAD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case