RAMESHBHAI SURSANGHBHAI PARMAR vs Helex Security and Consultant Services Advocate - B.B.Christian — 21/2019

Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33 (C) (2). Status: Reply. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.

Reply Next hearing 19-Jun-2026 this date has passed

RECO33C2 LC - Recovery 33C (2)

CNR: GJKH140000522019

Filing Number

21/2019

Filing Date

07-Feb-2019

Registration No

21/2019

Registration Date

07-Feb-2019

Court

LABOUR COURT, NADIAD

Judge

1-Judge, Labour Court

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33 (C) (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAMESHBHAI SURSANGHBHAI PARMAR

    Adv. D.H.Shah

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Helex Security and Consultant Services Advocate - B.B.Christian

  2. 2.Ceema Electricals Lighting Products India Pvt Lmited

    Adv. M.G.MEMON

Case History

  1. 19-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-May-2026

    Reply

    Judge, Labour Court

  3. 24-Apr-2026

    Reply

    Judge, Labour Court

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 21/2019 - Rameshbhai Sursanghbhai Parmar v. Helex Security and Consultant Services & Ceema Electricals Lighting Products India Pvt Ltd The petitioner's plea against respondent companies was ALLOWED and DISMISSED. The court found that the petitioner's current petition lacked legal merit under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016. The court held that since a Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) was already initiated against the corporate debtor by another creditor on 09.07.2024, and the petitioner had already filed claims in that proceeding which were admitted by the Interim Resolution Professional, the petitioner must pursue their relief through that established process rather than through separate judicial proceedings, which would create inconsistent orders and jurisdictional conflicts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 01-Apr-2026

    Reply

    Judge, Labour Court

  6. 23-Mar-2026

    Reply

    Judge, Labour Court

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    Reply

    Judge, Labour Court

  8. 05-Feb-2026

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  9. 30-Dec-2025

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  10. 25-Nov-2025

    Notice To Complainant

    Judge, Labour Court

  11. 25-Nov-2025

    Restored

    Judge, Labour Court

  12. 08-Mar-2022

    JudegementView PDF

  13. 08-Mar-2022

    Disposed

    Judge, Labour Court

  14. 24-Feb-2022

    For Order

    Judge, Labour Court

  15. 13-Jan-2022

    For Argument of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  16. 09-Dec-2021

    For Argument of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  17. 21-Oct-2021

    For Argument of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  18. 14-Oct-2021

    For Argument of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  19. 23-Sep-2021

    For Argument of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  20. 26-Aug-2021

    For Other evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  21. 03-Jun-2021

    For Other evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  22. 18-Mar-2021

    For Other evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  23. 18-Feb-2021

    For Other evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  24. 08-Dec-2020

    For Other evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  25. 07-Dec-2020

    For Other evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  26. 21-Sep-2020

    For Other evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  27. 06-Aug-2020

    For Other evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  28. 11-Jun-2020

    For Other evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  29. 28-May-2020

    For Other evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  30. 23-Apr-2020

    For Other evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  31. 19-Mar-2020

    For Other evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  32. 27-Feb-2020

    For Other evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  33. 30-Jan-2020

    For Other evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  34. 02-Jan-2020

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  35. 05-Dec-2019

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  36. 14-Nov-2019

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  37. 03-Oct-2019

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  38. 05-Sep-2019

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  39. 25-Jul-2019

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  40. 25-Jun-2019

    Reply

    Judge, Labour Court

  41. 07-May-2019

    Reply

    Judge, Labour Court

  42. 09-Apr-2019

    Reply

    Judge, Labour Court

  43. 19-Mar-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  44. 07-Feb-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. 21/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 21/2019 - Rameshbhai Sursanghbhai Parmar v. Helex Security and Consultant Services & Ceema Electricals Lighting Products India Pvt Ltd The petitioner's plea against respondent companies was ALLOWED and DISMISSED. The court found that the petitioner's current petition lacked legal merit under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016. The court held that since a Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) was already initiated against the corporate debtor by another creditor on 09.07.2024, and the petitioner had already filed claims in that proceeding which were admitted by the Interim Resolution Professional, the petitioner must pursue their relief through that established process rather than through separate judicial proceedings, which would create inconsistent orders and jurisdictional conflicts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case