PRAVINBHAI VISHNUBHAI PARMAR vs Helex Security and Consultant Services Advocate - B.B.Christian — 17/2019

Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33 (c) 2. Status: REPLY. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.

RECO33C2 LC - Recovery 33C (2)

CNR: GJKH140000482019

REPLY

Next Hearing

19th June 2026

Filing Number

17/2019

Filing Date

07-02-2019

Registration No

17/2019

Registration Date

07-02-2019

Court

LABOUR COURT, NADIAD

Judge

1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT

Acts & Sections

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33 (c) 2

Petitioner(s)

PRAVINBHAI VISHNUBHAI PARMAR

Adv. D.H.Shah

Respondent(s)

Helex Security and Consultant Services Advocate - B.B.Christian

Ceema Electricals Lighting Products India Pvt Lmited

Adv. M.G.MEMON

Hearing History

Judge: 1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT

08-05-2026

REPLY

24-04-2026

REPLY

01-04-2026

REPLY

23-03-2026

REPLY

12-03-2026

REPLY

Interim Orders

08-03-2022
JUDEGEMENT
01-04-2026
ORDER

Case Summary: 17/2019 Petition Allowed & Relief Granted The court allowed the petition filed by Pravinbhai Vishnubhai Parmar against Helex Security and Consultant Services and Ceema Electricals Lighting Products India Pvt Limited. The court granted relief to the petitioner regarding dues recovery and ordered that the recovery petition proceed accordingly. Additionally, the court dismissed the counter-claim/alternative pleas raised by the respondents, finding them legally unsustainable under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code provisions cited. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 17/2019 Petition Allowed & Relief Granted The court allowed the petition filed by Pravinbhai Vishnubhai Parmar against Helex Security and Consultant Services and Ceema Electricals Lighting Products India Pvt Limited. The court granted relief to the petitioner regarding dues recovery and ordered that the recovery petition proceed accordingly. Additionally, the court dismissed the counter-claim/alternative pleas raised by the respondents, finding them legally unsustainable under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code provisions cited. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

LABOUR COURT, NADIAD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case