MAHESHBHAI RAYSANGBHAI PARMAR vs Helex Security and Consultant Services Advocate - B.B.Christian — 16/2019
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33 (C) 2. Status: REPLY. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.
RECO33C2 LC - Recovery 33C (2)
CNR: GJKH140000472019
Next Hearing
19th June 2026
Filing Number
16/2019
Filing Date
07-02-2019
Registration No
16/2019
Registration Date
07-02-2019
Court
LABOUR COURT, NADIAD
Judge
1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MAHESHBHAI RAYSANGBHAI PARMAR
Adv. D. H. SHAH
Respondent(s)
Helex Security and Consultant Services Advocate - B.B.Christian
Ceema Electricals Lighting Products India Pvt Lmited
Adv. M.G.MEMON
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT
REPLY
REPLY
REPLY
REPLY
REPLY
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-05-2026 | REPLY |
| 24-04-2026 | REPLY |
| 01-04-2026 | REPLY |
| 23-03-2026 | REPLY |
| 12-03-2026 | REPLY |
Interim Orders
The court order, rendered by the Presiding Officer of the Labor Court (M.D.), Nadiad, addresses a petition filed by petitioner Maheshbhai Raysangbhai Parmar against respondents Helex Security and Consultant Services and Ceema Electricals Lighting Products India Pvt Limited. The petition was allowed in part: the court granted relief to petitioner regarding unpaid dues from Ceema Electricals Lighting Products India Pvt Limited and dismissed the petition against Helex Security and Consultant Services for lack of jurisdiction. The court emphasized that proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) would override conflicting claims under other laws, and directed that recovery proceedings follow statutory procedures while acknowledging the settled status of worker claims against the corporate debtor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court order, rendered by the Presiding Officer of the Labor Court (M.D.), Nadiad, addresses a petition filed by petitioner Maheshbhai Raysangbhai Parmar against respondents Helex Security and Consultant Services and Ceema Electricals Lighting Products India Pvt Limited. The petition was allowed in part: the court granted relief to petitioner regarding unpaid dues from Ceema Electricals Lighting Products India Pvt Limited and dismissed the petition against Helex Security and Consultant Services for lack of jurisdiction. The court emphasized that proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) would override conflicting claims under other laws, and directed that recovery proceedings follow statutory procedures while acknowledging the settled status of worker claims against the corporate debtor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts