MAHESHBHAI RAYSANGBHAI PARMAR vs Helex Security and Consultant Services Advocate - B.B.Christian — 16/2019

Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33 (C) 2. Status: REPLY. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.

RECO33C2 LC - Recovery 33C (2)

CNR: GJKH140000472019

REPLY

Next Hearing

19th June 2026

Filing Number

16/2019

Filing Date

07-02-2019

Registration No

16/2019

Registration Date

07-02-2019

Court

LABOUR COURT, NADIAD

Judge

1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT

Acts & Sections

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33 (C) 2

Petitioner(s)

MAHESHBHAI RAYSANGBHAI PARMAR

Adv. D. H. SHAH

Respondent(s)

Helex Security and Consultant Services Advocate - B.B.Christian

Ceema Electricals Lighting Products India Pvt Lmited

Adv. M.G.MEMON

Hearing History

Judge: 1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT

08-05-2026

REPLY

24-04-2026

REPLY

01-04-2026

REPLY

23-03-2026

REPLY

12-03-2026

REPLY

Interim Orders

08-03-2022
JUDEGEMENT
01-04-2026
ORDER

The court order, rendered by the Presiding Officer of the Labor Court (M.D.), Nadiad, addresses a petition filed by petitioner Maheshbhai Raysangbhai Parmar against respondents Helex Security and Consultant Services and Ceema Electricals Lighting Products India Pvt Limited. The petition was allowed in part: the court granted relief to petitioner regarding unpaid dues from Ceema Electricals Lighting Products India Pvt Limited and dismissed the petition against Helex Security and Consultant Services for lack of jurisdiction. The court emphasized that proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) would override conflicting claims under other laws, and directed that recovery proceedings follow statutory procedures while acknowledging the settled status of worker claims against the corporate debtor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court order, rendered by the Presiding Officer of the Labor Court (M.D.), Nadiad, addresses a petition filed by petitioner Maheshbhai Raysangbhai Parmar against respondents Helex Security and Consultant Services and Ceema Electricals Lighting Products India Pvt Limited. The petition was allowed in part: the court granted relief to petitioner regarding unpaid dues from Ceema Electricals Lighting Products India Pvt Limited and dismissed the petition against Helex Security and Consultant Services for lack of jurisdiction. The court emphasized that proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) would override conflicting claims under other laws, and directed that recovery proceedings follow statutory procedures while acknowledging the settled status of worker claims against the corporate debtor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

LABOUR COURT, NADIAD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case