MAHESHBHAI RAYSANGBHAI PARMAR vs Helex Security and Consultant Services Advocate - B.B.Christian — 16/2019
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33 (C) 2. Status: Reply. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.
RECO33C2 LC - Recovery 33C (2)
CNR: GJKH140000472019
Filing Number
16/2019
Filing Date
07-Feb-2019
Registration No
16/2019
Registration Date
07-Feb-2019
Court
LABOUR COURT, NADIAD
Judge
1-Judge, Labour Court
Last updated 27-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MAHESHBHAI RAYSANGBHAI PARMAR
Adv. D. H. SHAH
Respondent(s)
-
1.Helex Security and Consultant Services Advocate - B.B.Christian
-
2.Ceema Electricals Lighting Products India Pvt Lmited
Adv. M.G.MEMON
Case History
-
19-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
08-May-2026
Reply
Judge, Labour Court
-
24-Apr-2026
Reply
Judge, Labour Court
-
01-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
The court order, rendered by the Presiding Officer of the Labor Court (M.D.), Nadiad, addresses a petition filed by petitioner Maheshbhai Raysangbhai Parmar against respondents Helex Security and Consultant Services and Ceema Electricals Lighting Products India Pvt Limited. The petition was allowed in part: the court granted relief to petitioner regarding unpaid dues from Ceema Electricals Lighting Products India Pvt Limited and dismissed the petition against Helex Security and Consultant Services for lack of jurisdiction. The court emphasized that proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) would override conflicting claims under other laws, and directed that recovery proceedings follow statutory procedures while acknowledging the settled status of worker claims against the corporate debtor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
Reply
Judge, Labour Court
-
23-Mar-2026
Reply
Judge, Labour Court
-
12-Mar-2026
Reply
Judge, Labour Court
-
05-Feb-2026
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
30-Dec-2025
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
25-Nov-2025
Notice To Complainant
Judge, Labour Court
-
25-Nov-2025
Restored
Judge, Labour Court
-
08-Mar-2022
JudegementView PDF
-
08-Mar-2022
Disposed
Judge, Labour Court
-
24-Feb-2022
For Order
Judge, Labour Court
-
13-Jan-2022
For Argument of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
09-Dec-2021
For Argument of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
21-Oct-2021
For Argument of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
14-Oct-2021
For Argument of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
23-Sep-2021
For Argument of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
26-Aug-2021
For Other evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
03-Jun-2021
For Other evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
18-Mar-2021
For Other evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
18-Feb-2021
For Other evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
08-Dec-2020
For Other evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
07-Dec-2020
For Other evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
21-Sep-2020
For Other evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
06-Aug-2020
For Other evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
11-Jun-2020
For Other evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
28-May-2020
For Other evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
23-Apr-2020
For Other evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
19-Mar-2020
For Other evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
27-Feb-2020
For Other evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
30-Jan-2020
For Other evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
02-Jan-2020
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
05-Dec-2019
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
14-Nov-2019
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
03-Oct-2019
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
05-Sep-2019
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
25-Jul-2019
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
25-Jun-2019
Reply
Judge, Labour Court
-
07-May-2019
Reply
Judge, Labour Court
-
09-Apr-2019
Reply
Judge, Labour Court
-
19-Mar-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Feb-2019
Case filed
Registration No. 16/2019
The court order, rendered by the Presiding Officer of the Labor Court (M.D.), Nadiad, addresses a petition filed by petitioner Maheshbhai Raysangbhai Parmar against respondents Helex Security and Consultant Services and Ceema Electricals Lighting Products India Pvt Limited. The petition was allowed in part: the court granted relief to petitioner regarding unpaid dues from Ceema Electricals Lighting Products India Pvt Limited and dismissed the petition against Helex Security and Consultant Services for lack of jurisdiction. The court emphasized that proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) would override conflicting claims under other laws, and directed that recovery proceedings follow statutory procedures while acknowledging the settled status of worker claims against the corporate debtor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts