On behalf Of sheikh Liaquat Muhammadmiya General Secretary R.G. Tiwari vs Manger Shri , Public Women Service Union Advocate - Shashikant Parmar — 1/2024

Case under The Minimum Wages Act, 1948 Section 20. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

MWAPP LC - M.W.Application

CNR: GJKH140000222024

Filing Number

1/2024

Filing Date

08-Feb-2024

Registration No

1/2024

Registration Date

08-Feb-2024

Court

LABOUR COURT, NADIAD

Judge

1-Judge, Labour Court

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

The Minimum Wages Act, 1948 Section 20

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.On behalf Of sheikh Liaquat Muhammadmiya General Secretary R.G. Tiwari

    Adv. R.G.Tiwari, L.M.Patil

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Manger Shri , Public Women Service Union Advocate - Shashikant Parmar

  2. 2.Sant Paul mandir,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case 1/2024 Summary The petitioner sought minimum wage arrears under labor law against the respondents (Manager, Public Women Service Union, and Sant Paul Mandir). The court found that the petitioner and respondents had reached an out-of-court settlement for ₹3,00,000, and the petitioner confirmed he did not wish to proceed further. Consequently, the court dismissed the case by settling it through the agreed compromise on 14 March 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judge, Labour Court

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Lok Adalat

    Judge, Labour Court

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  6. 07-Feb-2026

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  7. 03-Jan-2026

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  8. 06-Dec-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  9. 01-Nov-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  10. 01-Oct-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  11. 20-Sep-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  12. 30-Aug-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  13. 02-Aug-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  14. 05-Jul-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  15. 17-May-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  16. 19-Apr-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  17. 29-Mar-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  18. 15-Mar-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  19. 01-Mar-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  20. 15-Feb-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  21. 18-Jan-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  22. 21-Dec-2024

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  23. 07-Dec-2024

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  24. 30-Nov-2024

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  25. 21-Nov-2024

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  26. 16-Nov-2024

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  27. 05-Oct-2024

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  28. 13-Sep-2024

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  29. 05-Sep-2024

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  30. 17-Aug-2024

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  31. 03-Aug-2024

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  32. 20-Jul-2024

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  33. 29-Jun-2024

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  34. 01-Jun-2024

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  35. 04-May-2024

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  36. 06-Apr-2024

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  37. 11-Mar-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  38. 08-Feb-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case 1/2024 Summary The petitioner sought minimum wage arrears under labor law against the respondents (Manager, Public Women Service Union, and Sant Paul Mandir). The court found that the petitioner and respondents had reached an out-of-court settlement for ₹3,00,000, and the petitioner confirmed he did not wish to proceed further. Consequently, the court dismissed the case by settling it through the agreed compromise on 14 March 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case