HEMANT RAMANLAL MEHTA vs SUDHABEN MAHESHBHAI KHANDLVAL — 37/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9,. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 03rd April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJKH120006932022
Next Hearing
03rd April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
37/2022
Filing Date
01-10-2022
Registration No
37/2022
Registration Date
01-10-2022
Court
TALUKA COURT, DAKOR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
HEMANT RAMANLAL MEHTA
Adv. D A RAJPUT
Respondent(s)
SUDHABEN MAHESHBHAI KHANDLVAL
ANUBEN MAHESHBHAI KHANDLVAL
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
ISSUES
ISSUES
ISSUES
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 18-02-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 27-01-2026 | ISSUES | |
| 03-01-2026 | ISSUES | |
| 27-11-2025 | ISSUES |
Interim Orders
Summary The court rejected the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction seeking possession of a shop property at Dakor market. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, as the defendants claimed a valid tenancy dating back 65 years with evidence of regular rent payments, while the plaintiff's ownership claim through inheritance requires trial proof. The balance of convenience was deemed insufficient to grant the interim relief, with costs to follow the final judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court rejected the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction seeking possession of a shop property at Dakor market. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, as the defendants claimed a valid tenancy dating back 65 years with evidence of regular rent payments, while the plaintiff's ownership claim through inheritance requires trial proof. The balance of convenience was deemed insufficient to grant the interim relief, with costs to follow the final judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts