HAYAT SIRAJ HAJI SULEMAN vs BAMROTIYA VAISHALI NIKUNJ KUMAR Advocate - A K PATEL — 56/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJKH120006202024
Filing Number
56/2024
Filing Date
26-06-2024
Registration No
56/2024
Registration Date
26-06-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, DAKOR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
HAYAT SIRAJ HAJI SULEMAN
Adv. C C PATEL
Respondent(s)
BAMROTIYA VAISHALI NIKUNJ KUMAR Advocate - A K PATEL
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 05-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 29-01-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 07-01-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court issued a compromise decree in Civil Suit 56/2024 between Hayat Siraj Haji Suleman and Bamrotiya Vaishali Nikunj Kumar, based on a compromise agreement (Exhibit-13) recorded in the presence of both parties and their advocates. The decree is conditional: it cannot prejudice third-party rights, and will be null and void if it adversely affects any third party, with no legal recourse available through the compromise in such cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court issued a compromise decree in Civil Suit 56/2024 between Hayat Siraj Haji Suleman and Bamrotiya Vaishali Nikunj Kumar, based on a compromise agreement (Exhibit-13) recorded in the presence of both parties and their advocates. The decree is conditional: it cannot prejudice third-party rights, and will be null and void if it adversely affects any third party, with no legal recourse available through the compromise in such cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts