PARMAR VIJAYBHAI NATWARBHAI vs VIJAYKUMAR SATYANARAYAN JOSHI Advocate - S B AHIR — 440/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKH120005332025
Filing Number
440/2025
Filing Date
04-Jul-2025
Registration No
440/2025
Registration Date
04-Jul-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, DAKOR
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Last updated 27-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PARMAR VIJAYBHAI NATWARBHAI
Adv. J J RAMI
Respondent(s)
-
1.VIJAYKUMAR SATYANARAYAN JOSHI Advocate - S B AHIR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order
Case Summary: 440/2025 The court ordered dismissal of the criminal case and acquittal of the accused based on a settlement agreement (Annexure 11-12) reached between petitioner Parmar Vijaybhai Natwarbhai and respondent Vijaykumar Satyanarayan Joshi. The court found no grounds to proceed further with the prosecution and directed the respondent advocate to refund the court fees to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Nov-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-Oct-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Aug-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Jul-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 440/2025
Case Summary: 440/2025 The court ordered dismissal of the criminal case and acquittal of the accused based on a settlement agreement (Annexure 11-12) reached between petitioner Parmar Vijaybhai Natwarbhai and respondent Vijaykumar Satyanarayan Joshi. The court found no grounds to proceed further with the prosecution and directed the respondent advocate to refund the court fees to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts