STATE OF GUJARAT vs SORANSING KANAIYALAL SIKLIGAR Advocate - V A RATHOD — 278/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 115(2),352,351(2),54. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 07th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKH120003472025
Filing Number
278/2025
Filing Date
23-04-2025
Registration No
278/2025
Registration Date
23-04-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, DAKOR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
07th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11204021240609
Police Station
DAKOR POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
SORANSING KANAIYALAL SIKLIGAR Advocate - V A RATHOD
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-04-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 30-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 24-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 16-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CC No. 278/2025 The Gujarat court acquitted Soransing Kanaiyalal Sikligar and his associates of charges under IPC sections 115(2), 352, 351(2), 54, and 135, finding insufficient evidence that they willfully caused injury. The accused's defense testimony, supported by the complainant's own contradictory statements, successfully negated the prosecution's allegations. The court applied the principle that when conviction appears improbable, courts should not waste valuable time continuing futile trials. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CC No. 278/2025 The Gujarat court acquitted Soransing Kanaiyalal Sikligar and his associates of charges under IPC sections 115(2), 352, 351(2), 54, and 135, finding insufficient evidence that they willfully caused injury. The accused's defense testimony, supported by the complainant's own contradictory statements, successfully negated the prosecution's allegations. The court applied the principle that when conviction appears improbable, courts should not waste valuable time continuing futile trials. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts