STATE OF GUJARAT vs JAYESHBHAI GOPALBHAI GOHIL Advocate - S B AHIR — 267/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 223. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH120003062026

Filing Number

267/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

267/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, DAKOR

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11204021250724

Police Station

DAKOR POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 223
Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 135

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF GUJARAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JAYESHBHAI GOPALBHAI GOHIL Advocate - S B AHIR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 267/2026 The court convicted accused Jayeshbhai Gopalbhai Gohil under IPC Section 223 and GP Act Section 135 for smuggling prohibited Chinese monofilament gold-marked fishing line (0.03 kg valued at ₹900) seized on 25/12/2025 in Kheda district. The accused confessed to the crime and requested leniency citing first offense and family responsibilities. The court sentenced him to a fine of ₹100 (or 10 days imprisonment if unpaid) and ordered seizure of the confiscated materials. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 267/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 267/2026 The court convicted accused Jayeshbhai Gopalbhai Gohil under IPC Section 223 and GP Act Section 135 for smuggling prohibited Chinese monofilament gold-marked fishing line (0.03 kg valued at ₹900) seized on 25/12/2025 in Kheda district. The accused confessed to the crime and requested leniency citing first offense and family responsibilities. The court sentenced him to a fine of ₹100 (or 10 days imprisonment if unpaid) and ordered seizure of the confiscated materials. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case