STATE OF GUJARAT vs KALIDAS - KALIYO SAMPATBHAI VAGHARI Advocate - S B AHIR — 250/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 30th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKH120003062025
Filing Number
250/2025
Filing Date
15-04-2025
Registration No
250/2025
Registration Date
15-04-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, DAKOR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11204021230367
Police Station
DAKOR POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
KALIDAS - KALIYO SAMPATBHAI VAGHARI Advocate - S B AHIR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 24-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 12-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 17-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 28-11-2025 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 250/2025 The court acquitted the respondent Kalidas (Kaliyo Sampatbhai Vaghari) of theft charges under IPC Section 379, finding insufficient evidence to prove the accused stole a mobile phone (VIVO Y 15, valued ₹13,999) on August 1-2, 2023. The prosecution failed to establish an eyewitness connection between the accused and the theft, and the investigative panchnamas lacked proper corroboration, rendering the core allegations unproven beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 250/2025 The court acquitted the respondent Kalidas (Kaliyo Sampatbhai Vaghari) of theft charges under IPC Section 379, finding insufficient evidence to prove the accused stole a mobile phone (VIVO Y 15, valued ₹13,999) on August 1-2, 2023. The prosecution failed to establish an eyewitness connection between the accused and the theft, and the investigative panchnamas lacked proper corroboration, rendering the core allegations unproven beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts