STATE OF GUJARAT vs SHANTABEN RAMESHBHAI RAIJIBHAI CHUNARA Advocate - S B AHIR — 250/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH120002882026

Filing Number

250/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

250/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, DAKOR

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11204021250662

Police Station

DAKOR POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF GUJARAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHANTABEN RAMESHBHAI RAIJIBHAI CHUNARA Advocate - S B AHIR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The court convicted the accused, Shantaben, under IPC Section 54(A)(B) for theft and sentenced her to imprisonment until the rising of court plus a fine of Rs. 100, with an alternative 10-day simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. The court considered her poor financial condition, status as sole family breadwinner, first-time offender status, remorse, and future reformation promise while imposing lenient sentence, following established judicial principles on sentencing discretion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 250/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court convicted the accused, Shantaben, under IPC Section 54(A)(B) for theft and sentenced her to imprisonment until the rising of court plus a fine of Rs. 100, with an alternative 10-day simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. The court considered her poor financial condition, status as sole family breadwinner, first-time offender status, remorse, and future reformation promise while imposing lenient sentence, following established judicial principles on sentencing discretion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case