STATE OF GUJARAT vs CHAMPABEN RAVAJIBHAI PARMAR Advocate - S B AHIR — 249/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH120002872026

Filing Number

249/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

249/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, DAKOR

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11204021260109

Police Station

DAKOR POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF GUJARAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.CHAMPABEN RAVAJIBHAI PARMAR Advocate - S B AHIR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The Gujarat court convicted the accused, Champaben Ravjibhai Parmar, under IPC Section 54(A)(B) for theft. Considering the accused's confession, her status as a poor woman solely supporting her family through daily earnings, and this being her first offense, the court sentenced her to imprisonment until the end of the trial plus a fine of ₹100, with 10 days additional imprisonment in default of payment, applying principles of judicial discretion to impose lenient punishment in exceptional circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 249/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Gujarat court convicted the accused, Champaben Ravjibhai Parmar, under IPC Section 54(A)(B) for theft. Considering the accused's confession, her status as a poor woman solely supporting her family through daily earnings, and this being her first offense, the court sentenced her to imprisonment until the end of the trial plus a fine of ₹100, with 10 days additional imprisonment in default of payment, applying principles of judicial discretion to impose lenient punishment in exceptional circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case