STATE OF GUJARAT vs DINESHKUMAR VAGHAJIBHAI PARMAR Advocate - N J PANDYA — 15/2026

Judegement

Case Summary: CC NO. 15-2026 Court Decision: The court acquitted the accused Dineshkumar Vaghajibhai Parmar of charges under IPC Sections 281, 125(b), and 177, 184 due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to establish the essential ingredients of the alleged offenses, and the accused's statement recorded by police could not corroborate the charges without independent corroborating evidence. Key Reasoning: The court found that while the accused allegedly obstructed a police officer and caused injury, the prosecution's evidence—including the accused's own police statement—lacked credible corroboration from medical or documentary records, and no substantive proof demonstrated the commission of the alleged crimes beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Disposed

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Final Arguments

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Process To Accused

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Process To Accused

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Process To Accused

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled

Case filed

Registration No. 15/2026