STATE OF GUJARAT vs SHANKARBHAI RAYJIBHAI VAGHELA Advocate - P H DAVE — 4/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 125(a),125(b),281. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 05th May 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKH120000082026
e-Filing Number
29-10-2025
Filing Number
4/2026
Filing Date
08-Jan-2026
Registration No
4/2026
Registration Date
08-Jan-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, DAKOR
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 16-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11204021250073
Police Station
DAKOR POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.SHANKARBHAI RAYJIBHAI VAGHELA Advocate - P H DAVE
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary of Case CC NO.04-2026 The Gujarat High Court acquitted accused Shankarbhai Rayjibhai Vaghela of charges under IPC Sections 279, 337, and 338 (rash/negligent driving causing hurt) due to insufficient prosecution evidence. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish key facts regarding the accident incident, including the vehicle number, driver identity, and vehicle speed, and no credible evidence supported rash or negligent conduct by the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Apr-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Apr-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 4/2026
Summary of Case CC NO.04-2026 The Gujarat High Court acquitted accused Shankarbhai Rayjibhai Vaghela of charges under IPC Sections 279, 337, and 338 (rash/negligent driving causing hurt) due to insufficient prosecution evidence. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish key facts regarding the accident incident, including the vehicle number, driver identity, and vehicle speed, and no credible evidence supported rash or negligent conduct by the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts