IDFC FIRST BANK LTD vs JITENDRA KUMAR — 164/2025
Case under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 Section 14. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 25th March 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJKH110015292025
Filing Number
164/2025
Filing Date
29-12-2025
Registration No
164/2025
Registration Date
29-12-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, KHEDA
Judge
3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
IDFC FIRST BANK LTD
Adv. V P GORI
Respondent(s)
JITENDRA KUMAR
RATHOD RAMILABEN
Hearing History
Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
ORDER/JUDGEMENT
PROCESS TO OPPONENT
PROCESS TO OPPONENT
PROCESS TO OPPONENT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | ORDER/JUDGEMENT |
| 07-03-2026 | PROCESS TO OPPONENT |
| 28-02-2026 | PROCESS TO OPPONENT |
| 12-02-2026 | PROCESS TO OPPONENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: IDFC FIRST BANK LTD v. JITENDRA KUMAR & RATHOD RAMILABEN (164/2025) The court granted IDFC First Bank's application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act to take possession of a mortgaged property (450 sq. ft. village property in Kheda district) valued at Rs. 3,73,025.47, which the borrowers defaulted on after failing to repay two secured loans totaling Rs. 4,49,000. The court authorized a Court Commissioner to seize and forward the asset to the bank, finding all statutory requirements satisfied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: IDFC FIRST BANK LTD v. JITENDRA KUMAR & RATHOD RAMILABEN (164/2025) The court granted IDFC First Bank's application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act to take possession of a mortgaged property (450 sq. ft. village property in Kheda district) valued at Rs. 3,73,025.47, which the borrowers defaulted on after failing to repay two secured loans totaling Rs. 4,49,000. The court authorized a Court Commissioner to seize and forward the asset to the bank, finding all statutory requirements satisfied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts