THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs PRATIKBHAI KANUBHAI KHANDVI — 1010/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 85,66(1)(b). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH110014082025

e-Filing Number

10-10-2025

Filing Number

1010/2025

Filing Date

25-Nov-2025

Registration No

1010/2025

Registration Date

25-Nov-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, KHEDA

Judge

1-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

519

Police Station

KHEDA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 85,66(1)(b)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PRATIKBHAI KANUBHAI KHANDVI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Judegement

    Summary The Kheda Additional District Judge convicted the accused under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(1)(b) for possessing liquor without permit. The court sentenced the accused to a fine of ₹200 with a default imprisonment of two days, considering the accused's first offense, poor economic condition, and voluntary plea of guilt, while emphasizing rehabilitation over severe punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  6. 12-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 25-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1010/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Kheda Additional District Judge convicted the accused under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(1)(b) for possessing liquor without permit. The court sentenced the accused to a fine of ₹200 with a default imprisonment of two days, considering the accused's first offense, poor economic condition, and voluntary plea of guilt, while emphasizing rehabilitation over severe punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case