THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs VIJAYBHAI JILUBHAI BHARVAD Advocate - H D SOLANKI — 973/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281,106(1),125(a),125(b). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 15th May 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH110013682025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

14-05-2025

Filing Number

973/2025

Filing Date

21-11-2025

Registration No

973/2025

Registration Date

21-11-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, KHEDA

Judge

3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

Decision Date

15th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

652

Police Station

KHEDA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281,106(1),125(a),125(b)
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 184,134,177

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

VIJAYBHAI JILUBHAI BHARVAD Advocate - H D SOLANKI

Hearing History

Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

15-05-2026

Disposed

08-05-2026

JUDGEMENT

15-04-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

16-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

18-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

15-05-2026
JUDEGEMENT

The court acquitted the accused Vijay Jilubhai Bharvad of charges under IPC sections 279, 304A, 337, 338, and 427, finding insufficient evidence that the accused was driving the motorcycle recklessly or was responsible for the accident that caused injuries to the state's witnesses. The court determined that the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt the identity of the motorcycle driver and the driver's culpability in the incident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court acquitted the accused Vijay Jilubhai Bharvad of charges under IPC sections 279, 304A, 337, 338, and 427, finding insufficient evidence that the accused was driving the motorcycle recklessly or was responsible for the accident that caused injuries to the state's witnesses. The court determined that the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt the identity of the motorcycle driver and the driver's culpability in the incident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, KHEDA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case