THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs VISALBHAI ALIAS PIYUSH MUKESHBHAI MAKAVANA(THAKOR) Advocate - S G MALEK — 889/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 74,352,324(4). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 09th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKH110012432025
e-Filing Number
14-05-2025
Filing Number
889/2025
Filing Date
13-10-2025
Registration No
889/2025
Registration Date
13-10-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, KHEDA
Judge
3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
09th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
1
Police Station
KHEDA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Respondent(s)
VISALBHAI ALIAS PIYUSH MUKESHBHAI MAKAVANA(THAKOR) Advocate - S G MALEK
Hearing History
Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 02-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 29-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 24-12-2025 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Cri.Case No. 889/2025 Court Decision: The court acquitted the accused Visalbhai (Piyush Mukeshbhai Makavana) under IPC Sections 74, 352, and 324(4), finding the prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court held that the prosecution's evidence, relying primarily on the complainant's testimony without corroborating material evidence, was insufficient to prove the alleged incident of assault occurred as described. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Cri.Case No. 889/2025 Court Decision: The court acquitted the accused Visalbhai (Piyush Mukeshbhai Makavana) under IPC Sections 74, 352, and 324(4), finding the prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court held that the prosecution's evidence, relying primarily on the complainant's testimony without corroborating material evidence, was insufficient to prove the alleged incident of assault occurred as described. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts