THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs BABUBHAI RANJITBHAI CHUNARA — 186/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 135(1). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH110002342026

e-Filing Number

20-02-2026

Filing Number

186/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

186/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KHEDA

Judge

1-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

38

Police Station

KHEDA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 135(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BABUBHAI RANJITBHAI CHUNARA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    The court reduced the sentence imposed on respondent Babubhai Ranjitbhai Chunara under IPC Section 135(1), sentencing him to a fine of Rs. 100 instead of imprisonment, considering his socio-economic status as a poor laborer with family dependents, his clean conduct record, and judicial precedent favoring lesser punishment. The conviction was upheld but the custodial sentence was set aside, allowing the respondent opportunity for reformation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 186/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court reduced the sentence imposed on respondent Babubhai Ranjitbhai Chunara under IPC Section 135(1), sentencing him to a fine of Rs. 100 instead of imprisonment, considering his socio-economic status as a poor laborer with family dependents, his clean conduct record, and judicial precedent favoring lesser punishment. The conviction was upheld but the custodial sentence was set aside, allowing the respondent opportunity for reformation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case