THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs SANJAYBHAI KANUBHAI VASFODA — 184/2026
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKH110002322026
e-Filing Number
16-02-2026
Filing Number
184/2026
Filing Date
06-03-2026
Registration No
184/2026
Registration Date
06-03-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, KHEDA
Judge
1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
62
Police Station
KHEDA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Respondent(s)
SANJAYBHAI KANUBHAI VASFODA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 184/2026 - The State of Gujarat v. Sanjaybhai Kanubhai Vasfoda The respondent was charged under the Motor Vehicles Act (Section 185) and Prohibition Act (Section 66(1)(b)) for rash and negligent driving while under the influence of alcohol on January 1, 2026. The respondent voluntarily pleaded guilty to the charges without coercion. The court, considering the respondent's impoverished background, regular employment hardship, prior good conduct, and undertaking not to repeat the offense, imposed a lenient sentence rather than the maximum. The court sentenced the respondent to a fine of Rs. 2,500 (or five days simple imprisonment if unpaid) instead of harsher punishment, and ordered release of seized property per procedure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 184/2026 - The State of Gujarat v. Sanjaybhai Kanubhai Vasfoda The respondent was charged under the Motor Vehicles Act (Section 185) and Prohibition Act (Section 66(1)(b)) for rash and negligent driving while under the influence of alcohol on January 1, 2026. The respondent voluntarily pleaded guilty to the charges without coercion. The court, considering the respondent's impoverished background, regular employment hardship, prior good conduct, and undertaking not to repeat the offense, imposed a lenient sentence rather than the maximum. The court sentenced the respondent to a fine of Rs. 2,500 (or five days simple imprisonment if unpaid) instead of harsher punishment, and ordered release of seized property per procedure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts