THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs VINUBHAI JENABHAI CHUNARA — 183/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH110002312026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

16-02-2026

Filing Number

183/2026

Filing Date

06-03-2026

Registration No

183/2026

Registration Date

06-03-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KHEDA

Judge

1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

71

Police Station

KHEDA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185
Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(b)

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Respondent(s)

VINUBHAI JENABHAI CHUNARA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

14-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary of Case 183/2026 The State of Gujarat v. Vinubhai Jenabhai Chunara The court convicted the respondent under IPC Section 185 and Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(b) for operating a vehicle in an uncontrolled manner on 04.02.2026 without proper documentation. The respondent voluntarily confessed to the charges. Considering the respondent's socioeconomic status as a poor, working-class individual, his first-time offence, his family obligations, and his self-admission of guilt with remorse, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 2,500 fine instead of the maximum penalty, balancing justice with humanitarian considerations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 183/2026 The State of Gujarat v. Vinubhai Jenabhai Chunara The court convicted the respondent under IPC Section 185 and Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(b) for operating a vehicle in an uncontrolled manner on 04.02.2026 without proper documentation. The respondent voluntarily confessed to the charges. Considering the respondent's socioeconomic status as a poor, working-class individual, his first-time offence, his family obligations, and his self-admission of guilt with remorse, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 2,500 fine instead of the maximum penalty, balancing justice with humanitarian considerations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, KHEDA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case