THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs VINUBHAI JENABHAI CHUNARA — 183/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH110002312026

e-Filing Number

16-02-2026

Filing Number

183/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

183/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KHEDA

Judge

1-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

71

Police Station

KHEDA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185
Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(b)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VINUBHAI JENABHAI CHUNARA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Judegement

    Summary of Case 183/2026 The State of Gujarat v. Vinubhai Jenabhai Chunara The court convicted the respondent under IPC Section 185 and Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(b) for operating a vehicle in an uncontrolled manner on 04.02.2026 without proper documentation. The respondent voluntarily confessed to the charges. Considering the respondent's socioeconomic status as a poor, working-class individual, his first-time offence, his family obligations, and his self-admission of guilt with remorse, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 2,500 fine instead of the maximum penalty, balancing justice with humanitarian considerations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 183/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 183/2026 The State of Gujarat v. Vinubhai Jenabhai Chunara The court convicted the respondent under IPC Section 185 and Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(b) for operating a vehicle in an uncontrolled manner on 04.02.2026 without proper documentation. The respondent voluntarily confessed to the charges. Considering the respondent's socioeconomic status as a poor, working-class individual, his first-time offence, his family obligations, and his self-admission of guilt with remorse, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 2,500 fine instead of the maximum penalty, balancing justice with humanitarian considerations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case