THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs ABDULBARIK ABDULVAHID SHEKH — 179/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 135(1). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH110002272026

e-Filing Number

22-01-2026

Filing Number

179/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

179/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KHEDA

Judge

1-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

29

Police Station

KHEDA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 135(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ABDULBARIK ABDULVAHID SHEKH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Abdulbarik Abdulvahid Shekh (179/2026) The court convicted the respondent under IPC Section 135(1) but imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 considering his socioeconomic status as a poor laborer and his family responsibilities. The court found that imprisonment would harm his dependents and relied on sentencing principles from precedent, determining that a reduced fine served justice better than incarceration in these circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 179/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Abdulbarik Abdulvahid Shekh (179/2026) The court convicted the respondent under IPC Section 135(1) but imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 considering his socioeconomic status as a poor laborer and his family responsibilities. The court found that imprisonment would harm his dependents and relied on sentencing principles from precedent, determining that a reduced fine served justice better than incarceration in these circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case