THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs SHAILESHBHAI SABURBHAI BENKAR — 177/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH110002242026

e-Filing Number

17-02-2026

Filing Number

177/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

177/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KHEDA

Judge

1-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

39

Police Station

KHEDA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185
Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(b)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHAILESHBHAI SABURBHAI BENKAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Judegement

    Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Shaileshbhai Saburbhai Benkar (177/2026) The court convicted the respondent under MV Act Section 185 and Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(b) for driving an unregistered vehicle while intoxicated. The court sentenced him to a fine of ₹2,500 with five days' simple imprisonment in default, exercising discretion to impose lenient punishment considering the respondent's poor socioeconomic status, first-time offence, and family circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 177/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Shaileshbhai Saburbhai Benkar (177/2026) The court convicted the respondent under MV Act Section 185 and Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(b) for driving an unregistered vehicle while intoxicated. The court sentenced him to a fine of ₹2,500 with five days' simple imprisonment in default, exercising discretion to impose lenient punishment considering the respondent's poor socioeconomic status, first-time offence, and family circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case