THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs GOPALBHAI KARSHANBHAI VAGHRI — 175/2026
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185,181. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKH110002222026
e-Filing Number
23-02-2026
Filing Number
175/2026
Filing Date
05-03-2026
Registration No
175/2026
Registration Date
05-03-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, KHEDA
Judge
1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
87
Police Station
KHEDA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Respondent(s)
GOPALBHAI KARSHANBHAI VAGHRI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Gopalbhai Karshanbhai Vaghri (175/2026) The accused was charged under Motor Vehicles Act §185, §181 and Prohibition Act §22(1)(b) for rash/negligent driving and operating a vehicle under alcohol influence on 13/02/2026. The court, considering the accused's voluntary guilty plea, poor economic circumstances, first-time offense, family dependence, and prospects of reform, sentenced him to imprisonment up to 5 days and fine of ₹2,500 (or 5 additional days imprisonment in default) rather than the maximum prescribed penalties, in accordance with principles of proportionate justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Gopalbhai Karshanbhai Vaghri (175/2026) The accused was charged under Motor Vehicles Act §185, §181 and Prohibition Act §22(1)(b) for rash/negligent driving and operating a vehicle under alcohol influence on 13/02/2026. The court, considering the accused's voluntary guilty plea, poor economic circumstances, first-time offense, family dependence, and prospects of reform, sentenced him to imprisonment up to 5 days and fine of ₹2,500 (or 5 additional days imprisonment in default) rather than the maximum prescribed penalties, in accordance with principles of proportionate justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts