THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs USHABEN RAJUBHAI BHIKHABHAI CHUNARA — 165/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH110002002026

e-Filing Number

18-02-2026

Filing Number

165/2026

Filing Date

24-Feb-2026

Registration No

165/2026

Registration Date

24-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KHEDA

Judge

1-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

53

Police Station

KHEDA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.USHABEN RAJUBHAI BHIKHABHAI CHUNARA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Judegement

    The court convicted the respondent Ushaben Rajubhai Bhikhabhai Chunara under Section 65 of the Prohibition Act for possessing 3 liters of country liquor valued at ₹600. However, considering the respondent's impoverished circumstances, status as a daily wage laborer supporting a family, and that this was her first offense, the court imposed a lenient sentence of imprisonment until the court's rising and a fine of ₹200 (or 5 days simple imprisonment if fine remains unpaid), rather than the statutory minimum punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 165/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the respondent Ushaben Rajubhai Bhikhabhai Chunara under Section 65 of the Prohibition Act for possessing 3 liters of country liquor valued at ₹600. However, considering the respondent's impoverished circumstances, status as a daily wage laborer supporting a family, and that this was her first offense, the court imposed a lenient sentence of imprisonment until the court's rising and a fine of ₹200 (or 5 days simple imprisonment if fine remains unpaid), rather than the statutory minimum punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case