THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs BACHIBEN BHIKHABHAI CHAUHAN — 162/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH110001972026

e-Filing Number

16-01-2026

Filing Number

162/2026

Filing Date

24-Feb-2026

Registration No

162/2026

Registration Date

24-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KHEDA

Judge

1-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

14

Police Station

KHEDA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BACHIBEN BHIKHABHAI CHAUHAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Judegement

    Case Summary: 162/2026 - State of Gujarat v. Bachiben Bhikhabhai Chauhan The court convicted the accused Bachiben Bhikhabhai Chauhan under Prohibition Act Section 65 for possessing 4 liters of illicit liquor valued at ₹800. Considering the accused's impoverished background, first-time offense, and family dependence, the court imposed a lenient sentence of imprisonment until trial completion and a fine of ₹200 (or 5 days simple imprisonment in default), rather than the maximum statutory punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 162/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 162/2026 - State of Gujarat v. Bachiben Bhikhabhai Chauhan The court convicted the accused Bachiben Bhikhabhai Chauhan under Prohibition Act Section 65 for possessing 4 liters of illicit liquor valued at ₹800. Considering the accused's impoverished background, first-time offense, and family dependence, the court imposed a lenient sentence of imprisonment until trial completion and a fine of ₹200 (or 5 days simple imprisonment in default), rather than the maximum statutory punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case