THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs PARVATIBEN KALIDAS TALAPADA — 161/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH110001962026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

19-01-2026

Filing Number

161/2026

Filing Date

24-02-2026

Registration No

161/2026

Registration Date

24-02-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KHEDA

Judge

1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

19

Police Station

KHEDA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a)

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Respondent(s)

PARVATIBEN KALIDAS TALAPADA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

14-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Parvatiben Kalidas Talapada (161/2026) The court convicted the accused Parvatiben under the Prohibition Act Section 65 for possessing 4 liters of country liquor valued at Rs. 800. The accused pleaded guilty and sought leniency, citing her impoverished background and family dependence. The court imposed a lenient sentence of 15 days simple imprisonment and Rs. 200 fine (instead of maximum punishment), recognizing her first offense, poor economic status, and voluntary confession as mitigating factors. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Parvatiben Kalidas Talapada (161/2026) The court convicted the accused Parvatiben under the Prohibition Act Section 65 for possessing 4 liters of country liquor valued at Rs. 800. The accused pleaded guilty and sought leniency, citing her impoverished background and family dependence. The court imposed a lenient sentence of 15 days simple imprisonment and Rs. 200 fine (instead of maximum punishment), recognizing her first offense, poor economic status, and voluntary confession as mitigating factors. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, KHEDA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case