THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs JAHALBEN TINABHAI CHUNARA — 159/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH110001942026

e-Filing Number

22-01-2026

Filing Number

159/2026

Filing Date

24-Feb-2026

Registration No

159/2026

Registration Date

24-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KHEDA

Judge

1-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

25

Police Station

KHEDA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JAHALBEN TINABHAI CHUNARA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Judegement

    Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Jahalben Tinabhai Chunara (159/2026) The court convicted Jahalben Tinabhai Chunara under Section 65 of the Prohibition Act for possessing 2 liters of illicit liquor worth ₹400. However, considering the accused's first-time offence, poor economic status, and family dependency, the court imposed a lenient sentence of imprisonment until trial completion plus a fine of ₹200, rather than the maximum prescribed penalty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 159/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Jahalben Tinabhai Chunara (159/2026) The court convicted Jahalben Tinabhai Chunara under Section 65 of the Prohibition Act for possessing 2 liters of illicit liquor worth ₹400. However, considering the accused's first-time offence, poor economic status, and family dependency, the court imposed a lenient sentence of imprisonment until trial completion plus a fine of ₹200, rather than the maximum prescribed penalty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case