THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs BHARATIBEN RATILAL BACHUBHAI CHUNARA — 156/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH110001912026

e-Filing Number

16-02-2026

Filing Number

156/2026

Filing Date

24-Feb-2026

Registration No

156/2026

Registration Date

24-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KHEDA

Judge

1-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

10

Police Station

KHEDA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BHARATIBEN RATILAL BACHUBHAI CHUNARA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Bharatiben Ratilal Bachubhai Chunara (156/2026) The court convicted the respondent under Section 65 of the Prohibition Act for illegally possessing 4 liters of country liquor valued at ₹800. The court sentenced her to imprisonment until trial completion and a fine of ₹200, with five additional days' simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. Considering the respondent's poor economic status, family dependence, and first-time offense, the court imposed lenient punishment rather than the maximum statutory sentence, balancing justice with humanitarian considerations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 156/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Bharatiben Ratilal Bachubhai Chunara (156/2026) The court convicted the respondent under Section 65 of the Prohibition Act for illegally possessing 4 liters of country liquor valued at ₹800. The court sentenced her to imprisonment until trial completion and a fine of ₹200, with five additional days' simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. Considering the respondent's poor economic status, family dependence, and first-time offense, the court imposed lenient punishment rather than the maximum statutory sentence, balancing justice with humanitarian considerations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case