THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs SHIVABHAI SHANABHAI GOHEL — 153/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKH110001882026
e-Filing Number
16-02-2026
Filing Number
153/2026
Filing Date
24-02-2026
Registration No
153/2026
Registration Date
24-02-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, KHEDA
Judge
1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
16
Police Station
KHEDA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Respondent(s)
SHIVABHAI SHANABHAI GOHEL
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Shivabhai Shanabhai Gohel (153/2026) The court convicted the respondent under Section 65 of the Prohibition Act for possessing 4 liters of illicit liquor valued at ₹800. The respondent pleaded guilty and requested lenient sentencing, citing his status as a poor, working-class family man. The court imposed a reduced sentence—imprisonment until trial completion plus a fine of ₹200 (instead of the statutory minimum)—recognizing mitigating circumstances and the principles of judicial discretion to impose lighter sentences when justified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Shivabhai Shanabhai Gohel (153/2026) The court convicted the respondent under Section 65 of the Prohibition Act for possessing 4 liters of illicit liquor valued at ₹800. The respondent pleaded guilty and requested lenient sentencing, citing his status as a poor, working-class family man. The court imposed a reduced sentence—imprisonment until trial completion plus a fine of ₹200 (instead of the statutory minimum)—recognizing mitigating circumstances and the principles of judicial discretion to impose lighter sentences when justified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts