THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs CHANDRAKANTBHAI NAGINBHAI TALPADA — 149/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH110001842026

e-Filing Number

06-01-2026

Filing Number

149/2026

Filing Date

23-Feb-2026

Registration No

149/2026

Registration Date

23-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KHEDA

Judge

1-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

689

Police Station

KHEDA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.CHANDRAKANTBHAI NAGINBHAI TALPADA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary: Case 149/2026 - State of Gujarat v. Chandrakantbhai Naginbhai Talpada The court convicted the respondent under the Prohibition Act for possessing foreign liquor (2700 ML) found during a police check on 10/12/2025. The respondent pleaded guilty and sought leniency citing his poor economic status and family responsibilities. The court imposed a reduced sentence of Rs. 500 fine (instead of maximum penalty) and simple imprisonment of 5 days, considering his first-time offense, poverty, and mitigating circumstances, while directing confiscation of the seized liquor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 149/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Case 149/2026 - State of Gujarat v. Chandrakantbhai Naginbhai Talpada The court convicted the respondent under the Prohibition Act for possessing foreign liquor (2700 ML) found during a police check on 10/12/2025. The respondent pleaded guilty and sought leniency citing his poor economic status and family responsibilities. The court imposed a reduced sentence of Rs. 500 fine (instead of maximum penalty) and simple imprisonment of 5 days, considering his first-time offense, poverty, and mitigating circumstances, while directing confiscation of the seized liquor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case