THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs CHANDRAKANTBHAI NAGINBHAI TALPADA — 149/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKH110001842026
e-Filing Number
06-01-2026
Filing Number
149/2026
Filing Date
23-02-2026
Registration No
149/2026
Registration Date
23-02-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, KHEDA
Judge
1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
689
Police Station
KHEDA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Respondent(s)
CHANDRAKANTBHAI NAGINBHAI TALPADA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: Case 149/2026 - State of Gujarat v. Chandrakantbhai Naginbhai Talpada The court convicted the respondent under the Prohibition Act for possessing foreign liquor (2700 ML) found during a police check on 10/12/2025. The respondent pleaded guilty and sought leniency citing his poor economic status and family responsibilities. The court imposed a reduced sentence of Rs. 500 fine (instead of maximum penalty) and simple imprisonment of 5 days, considering his first-time offense, poverty, and mitigating circumstances, while directing confiscation of the seized liquor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: Case 149/2026 - State of Gujarat v. Chandrakantbhai Naginbhai Talpada The court convicted the respondent under the Prohibition Act for possessing foreign liquor (2700 ML) found during a police check on 10/12/2025. The respondent pleaded guilty and sought leniency citing his poor economic status and family responsibilities. The court imposed a reduced sentence of Rs. 500 fine (instead of maximum penalty) and simple imprisonment of 5 days, considering his first-time offense, poverty, and mitigating circumstances, while directing confiscation of the seized liquor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts