THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs MINABEN MUKESHBHAI JAYANTIBHAI TALAPDA — 147/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKH110001822026
e-Filing Number
27-01-2026
Filing Number
147/2026
Filing Date
23-02-2026
Registration No
147/2026
Registration Date
23-02-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, KHEDA
Judge
1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
43
Police Station
KHEDA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Respondent(s)
MINABEN MUKESHBHAI JAYANTIBHAI TALAPDA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 147/2026 Summary: The court convicted the accused Minaben Mukeshbhai Jayantibhai Talapda under the Prohibition Act Section 65 for possessing 3 liters of illicit liquor worth Rs. 600 seized during a police check on 25/01/2026. The accused pleaded guilty and sought lenient punishment citing his poor economic status and family responsibilities. The court sentenced him to 6 months imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 200, with 5 days additional imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid, considering his first-time offender status and mitigating circumstances while maintaining justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 147/2026 Summary: The court convicted the accused Minaben Mukeshbhai Jayantibhai Talapda under the Prohibition Act Section 65 for possessing 3 liters of illicit liquor worth Rs. 600 seized during a police check on 25/01/2026. The accused pleaded guilty and sought lenient punishment citing his poor economic status and family responsibilities. The court sentenced him to 6 months imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 200, with 5 days additional imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid, considering his first-time offender status and mitigating circumstances while maintaining justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts