THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs URMILABEN JITENDRA CHUNARA — 145/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKH110001802026
e-Filing Number
27-01-2026
Filing Number
145/2026
Filing Date
23-02-2026
Registration No
145/2026
Registration Date
23-02-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, KHEDA
Judge
1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
6
Police Station
KHEDA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Respondent(s)
URMILABEN JITENDRA CHUNARA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Urmilaben Jitendra Chunara (145/2026) The court convicted Urmilaben under Section 65 of the Prohibition Act for illegally possessing 2 liters of foreign liquor (valued ₹400) found during a police check on 06/01/2026. The accused pleaded guilty and sought leniency, citing her status as a poor, working-class woman supporting her family. The court sentenced her to 5 days simple imprisonment and imposed a fine of ₹200, with an additional 5 days imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. The court exercised judicial discretion to impose a lighter sentence than statutory minimum, considering her impoverished circumstances and first-time offender status. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Urmilaben Jitendra Chunara (145/2026) The court convicted Urmilaben under Section 65 of the Prohibition Act for illegally possessing 2 liters of foreign liquor (valued ₹400) found during a police check on 06/01/2026. The accused pleaded guilty and sought leniency, citing her status as a poor, working-class woman supporting her family. The court sentenced her to 5 days simple imprisonment and imposed a fine of ₹200, with an additional 5 days imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. The court exercised judicial discretion to impose a lighter sentence than statutory minimum, considering her impoverished circumstances and first-time offender status. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts