THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs SAKARBEN PUNAMBHAI AMRABHAI CHUNARA — 138/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH110001732026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

16-02-2026

Filing Number

138/2026

Filing Date

23-02-2026

Registration No

138/2026

Registration Date

23-02-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KHEDA

Judge

1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

31

Police Station

KHEDA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a)

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Respondent(s)

SAKARBEN PUNAMBHAI AMRABHAI CHUNARA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

14-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: 138/2026 - State of Gujarat v. Sakarben Punambhai Amrabhai Chunara The court convicted the accused under Section 65 of the Prohibition Act for possessing 3 liters of illicit liquor worth ₹600. Considering the accused's impoverished background, first-time offender status, and family dependence, the court imposed a reduced sentence of imprisonment until trial completion and a fine of ₹200 (instead of maximum penalties), emphasizing that proportionate punishment serves justice better than severe sentences in such cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 138/2026 - State of Gujarat v. Sakarben Punambhai Amrabhai Chunara The court convicted the accused under Section 65 of the Prohibition Act for possessing 3 liters of illicit liquor worth ₹600. Considering the accused's impoverished background, first-time offender status, and family dependence, the court imposed a reduced sentence of imprisonment until trial completion and a fine of ₹200 (instead of maximum penalties), emphasizing that proportionate punishment serves justice better than severe sentences in such cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, KHEDA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case