THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs CHETANBHAI BHURABHAI KAHAR — 137/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKH110001722026
e-Filing Number
16-02-2026
Filing Number
137/2026
Filing Date
23-02-2026
Registration No
137/2026
Registration Date
23-02-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, KHEDA
Judge
1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
45
Police Station
KHEDA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Respondent(s)
CHETANBHAI BHURABHAI KAHAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 137/2026: State of Gujarat v. Chetanbhai Bhurabhai Kahar The court convicted the respondent under the Prohibition Act for possessing 5 liters of country liquor valued at ₹1,000, but imposed lenient punishment considering mitigating circumstances—his impoverished background, first-time offense, and family dependence on his labor. The court sentenced him to simple imprisonment until court rising and imposed a fine of ₹200, with 5 additional days' simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid, emphasizing that substantive justice is better served through measured rather than severe punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 137/2026: State of Gujarat v. Chetanbhai Bhurabhai Kahar The court convicted the respondent under the Prohibition Act for possessing 5 liters of country liquor valued at ₹1,000, but imposed lenient punishment considering mitigating circumstances—his impoverished background, first-time offense, and family dependence on his labor. The court sentenced him to simple imprisonment until court rising and imposed a fine of ₹200, with 5 additional days' simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid, emphasizing that substantive justice is better served through measured rather than severe punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts