THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs SHAILESHBHAI BHIKHABHAI CHUNARA — 135/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH110001702026

e-Filing Number

27-01-2026

Filing Number

135/2026

Filing Date

23-Feb-2026

Registration No

135/2026

Registration Date

23-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KHEDA

Judge

1-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

28

Police Station

KHEDA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHAILESHBHAI BHIKHABHAI CHUNARA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: The State of Gujarat v. Shaileshbhai Bhikhabhai Chunara (135/2026) The court convicted the accused under the Prohibition Act for possessing 15 liters of illicit liquor valued at ₹3,000. However, recognizing the accused's poverty, first-time offense, and family circumstances, the court imposed a reduced sentence of conviction with a fine of ₹200, rather than the statutory maximum punishment. The seized contraband was ordered to be destroyed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 135/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The State of Gujarat v. Shaileshbhai Bhikhabhai Chunara (135/2026) The court convicted the accused under the Prohibition Act for possessing 15 liters of illicit liquor valued at ₹3,000. However, recognizing the accused's poverty, first-time offense, and family circumstances, the court imposed a reduced sentence of conviction with a fine of ₹200, rather than the statutory maximum punishment. The seized contraband was ordered to be destroyed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case