THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs REKHABEN VIJAYBHAI VIKRAMBHAI CHUNARA — 133/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH110001672026

e-Filing Number

20-02-2026

Filing Number

133/2026

Filing Date

20-Feb-2026

Registration No

133/2026

Registration Date

20-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KHEDA

Judge

1-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

662

Police Station

KHEDA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.REKHABEN VIJAYBHAI VIKRAMBHAI CHUNARA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    The court convicted the respondent, Rekhaben Vijaybhai Chunara, under Section 65 of the Prohibition Act for illegally possessing 5 liters of country liquor (valued at ₹1,000) seized during a police check on December 2, 2025. Given the respondent's plea of guilt, first-time offence, impoverished background, and family dependence, the court imposed lenient sentencing: conviction with a fine of ₹200 and, if unpaid, 5 days simple imprisonment, rather than the statutory maximum penalty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 133/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the respondent, Rekhaben Vijaybhai Chunara, under Section 65 of the Prohibition Act for illegally possessing 5 liters of country liquor (valued at ₹1,000) seized during a police check on December 2, 2025. Given the respondent's plea of guilt, first-time offence, impoverished background, and family dependence, the court imposed lenient sentencing: conviction with a fine of ₹200 and, if unpaid, 5 days simple imprisonment, rather than the statutory maximum penalty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case