THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs BHARATBHAI RAMANBHAI DABHI — 131/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185,181. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH110001652026

e-Filing Number

22-12-2025

Filing Number

131/2026

Filing Date

20-Feb-2026

Registration No

131/2026

Registration Date

20-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KHEDA

Judge

1-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

665

Police Station

KHEDA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185,181
Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(b)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BHARATBHAI RAMANBHAI DABHI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Bharatbhai Ramanbhai Dabhi (131/2026) The court convicted the accused Bharatbhai Ramanbhai Dabhi under IPC Sections 185, 336-337, and Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(b) for rash and negligent driving while intoxicated on 13/12/2025. The court imposed a fine of ₹2,500 (or 5 days simple imprisonment in default), considering the accused's financial hardship, family dependence, and first-time offense, while balancing justice with proportionate sentencing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 131/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Bharatbhai Ramanbhai Dabhi (131/2026) The court convicted the accused Bharatbhai Ramanbhai Dabhi under IPC Sections 185, 336-337, and Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(b) for rash and negligent driving while intoxicated on 13/12/2025. The court imposed a fine of ₹2,500 (or 5 days simple imprisonment in default), considering the accused's financial hardship, family dependence, and first-time offense, while balancing justice with proportionate sentencing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case