THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs UPENDRAKUMAR RAMANBHAI VASAVA — 126/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH110001602026

e-Filing Number

06-01-2026

Filing Number

126/2026

Filing Date

20-Feb-2026

Registration No

126/2026

Registration Date

20-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KHEDA

Judge

1-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

714

Police Station

KHEDA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185
Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(b)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UPENDRAKUMAR RAMANBHAI VASAVA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Upendrakumar Ramanbhai Vasava (126/2026) The court convicted the respondent under Motor Vehicles Act Section 185 and Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(b) for driving a vehicle on a highway without maintaining orderly conduct while under the influence of alcohol. The respondent voluntarily confessed to the offense and cooperated with the investigation. Considering the respondent's impoverished economic status, first offense, genuine remorse, and family dependence, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 2,500 fine instead of maximum punishment, finding lighter punishment serves justice better. Additionally, 5 days simple imprisonment was imposed in default of fine payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 126/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Upendrakumar Ramanbhai Vasava (126/2026) The court convicted the respondent under Motor Vehicles Act Section 185 and Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(b) for driving a vehicle on a highway without maintaining orderly conduct while under the influence of alcohol. The respondent voluntarily confessed to the offense and cooperated with the investigation. Considering the respondent's impoverished economic status, first offense, genuine remorse, and family dependence, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 2,500 fine instead of maximum punishment, finding lighter punishment serves justice better. Additionally, 5 days simple imprisonment was imposed in default of fine payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case