THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs BHARTIBEN SANJAYBHAI CHUNARA — 124/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKH110001582026
e-Filing Number
19-01-2026
Filing Number
124/2026
Filing Date
20-02-2026
Registration No
124/2026
Registration Date
20-02-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, KHEDA
Judge
1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
708
Police Station
KHEDA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Respondent(s)
BHARTIBEN SANJAYBHAI CHUNARA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 124/2026: State of Gujarat v. Bhartiben Sanjaybhai Chunara The court convicted Bhartiben Sanjaybhai Chunara under Section 65(A) of the Prohibition Act for possessing 5 liters of country liquor valued at ₹1,000 on December 21, 2025. Considering the accused's status as a poor, hardworking family provider committing her first offense and her voluntary guilty plea, the court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹200 fine instead of the statutory minimum, exercising its discretionary power under established precedent to impose lighter punishment when compelling mitigating circumstances exist. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 124/2026: State of Gujarat v. Bhartiben Sanjaybhai Chunara The court convicted Bhartiben Sanjaybhai Chunara under Section 65(A) of the Prohibition Act for possessing 5 liters of country liquor valued at ₹1,000 on December 21, 2025. Considering the accused's status as a poor, hardworking family provider committing her first offense and her voluntary guilty plea, the court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹200 fine instead of the statutory minimum, exercising its discretionary power under established precedent to impose lighter punishment when compelling mitigating circumstances exist. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts