THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs BHARTIBEN SANJAYBHAI CHUNARA — 124/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH110001582026

e-Filing Number

19-01-2026

Filing Number

124/2026

Filing Date

20-Feb-2026

Registration No

124/2026

Registration Date

20-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KHEDA

Judge

1-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

708

Police Station

KHEDA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BHARTIBEN SANJAYBHAI CHUNARA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Judegement

    Summary of Case 124/2026: State of Gujarat v. Bhartiben Sanjaybhai Chunara The court convicted Bhartiben Sanjaybhai Chunara under Section 65(A) of the Prohibition Act for possessing 5 liters of country liquor valued at ₹1,000 on December 21, 2025. Considering the accused's status as a poor, hardworking family provider committing her first offense and her voluntary guilty plea, the court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹200 fine instead of the statutory minimum, exercising its discretionary power under established precedent to impose lighter punishment when compelling mitigating circumstances exist. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 124/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 124/2026: State of Gujarat v. Bhartiben Sanjaybhai Chunara The court convicted Bhartiben Sanjaybhai Chunara under Section 65(A) of the Prohibition Act for possessing 5 liters of country liquor valued at ₹1,000 on December 21, 2025. Considering the accused's status as a poor, hardworking family provider committing her first offense and her voluntary guilty plea, the court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹200 fine instead of the statutory minimum, exercising its discretionary power under established precedent to impose lighter punishment when compelling mitigating circumstances exist. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case