THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs SURESHBHAI KANUBHAI VASAVA — 123/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH110001572026

e-Filing Number

08-12-2025

Filing Number

123/2026

Filing Date

20-Feb-2026

Registration No

123/2026

Registration Date

20-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KHEDA

Judge

1-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

669

Police Station

KHEDA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SURESHBHAI KANUBHAI VASAVA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case 123/2026 Summary: The court convicted Sureshbhai Kanubhai Vasava under the Prohibition Act for possessing 3 liters of illicit liquor valued at ₹600. Considering mitigating circumstances—the accused's first offense, poor economic status, and family dependence—the court imposed a lenient sentence of imprisonment (5 days) and a fine of ₹200, rather than the maximum statutory penalty, emphasizing that justice is better served through proportionate punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 123/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 123/2026 Summary: The court convicted Sureshbhai Kanubhai Vasava under the Prohibition Act for possessing 3 liters of illicit liquor valued at ₹600. Considering mitigating circumstances—the accused's first offense, poor economic status, and family dependence—the court imposed a lenient sentence of imprisonment (5 days) and a fine of ₹200, rather than the maximum statutory penalty, emphasizing that justice is better served through proportionate punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case